December 2000 Archives
Less than eight hours remaining in the False Millennium. Thank ghod, the Year of Too Many Zeroes seems to have been a brutal one, and I hope the next one will be better. Happy New Year, everyone!
P.S. I've never been much for resolutions, and don't believe I made any last year. However, even though I've fooled around, and even backslid a few times, 2000 is the first year in which I have ever weighed less on December 31 than on January 1. Maybe next year I can do even better.
The other night, Hunter's Aspen neighbor's heard a barrage of shotgun bursts coming from his ranch. Apparently suffering what you could call "election-anxiety angst," Thompson awoke from a troubled sleep, ran outside into the snow, and started blazing away at shadows. All the time, he was raging against Bush - although I'm sure he stopped well short of actually making threats against the president-elect. That would be a federal matter, and Hunter steers well clear of government agencies.[via Media News]
I say, Go to hell. I mean it. Maybe this form means nothing to you. Well, fine, because I am not writing for you. I am writing for me. I am writing for what I get out of the process of thinking about a political issue or a scientific discovery and explaining it to my readers. I am writing for the responses I get from my readers. I am writing for the interplay with the larger community of webloggers.In case he tones this masterpiece down in the light of day, I'll link the original post to MeFi for archival goodness. At any rate, Dan and Rebecca both make similar points about weblogging as self-discovery. There's something about writing for an audience, no matter how small (or even imaginary), that makes you have to explore your own ideas more deeply than you would ordinarily.
So spread the word. No copy protection should exist ANYWHERE in generic computer hardware! It's up to the BUYER to determine what to use their product for. It's not up to the vendors of generic hardware, and certainly not up to a record company that's shadily influencing those vendors in back-room meetings. Demand a policy declaration from your vendor that they will build only open hardware, not covertly controlled hardware. Use your purchasing dollars to enforce that policy.There's no reason why CPRM can't go the same way as DIVX. Just remember that DIVX failed because informed consumers took a careful look at the technology, saw its limitations, decided that wasn't what they wanted, and made their feelings clear. If you don't want restrictions on your use of your future hard drives, let the industry know.
Any hardware device that limits what consumers can do with their music or video files will face steep hurdles before being adopted. Previous devices with built-in copy protection have reached the market only to disappear under the weight of consumer indifference.If the feedback to this ZDNN article is any indication, the answer is a resounding "Hell, No!"
- Supporting programs to help victims of domestic violence: $2 million.
- Advertising your good works to show what a good corporate citizen you are: $108 million.
- Good publicity for a company making a detested product: Priceless.
Some within the movement advocate centralized global government as the solution to corporate globalization; others seek a reassertion of national or even local sovereignty. But the problems of globalization are unlikely to be solved either by some central global authority or by national or local autarky. The real choice today is between a globalization from above that disempowers people at every level and a globalization from below that expands self-government not only at a global level but at regional, national and local levels as well.
The ramifications are enormous. Although the benefit to producers is great - bringing the holy grail of secure content one step closer - the costs to consumers will be significant. For example, corporate IT departments will be unable to mix compliant and non-compliant ATA drives as they try to enforce uniform back up policies, we've discovered. Restoring personal backups to a different physical drive - a common enough occurrence when a disk has failed - will require authentication with a central server. Imaging software used by OEMs and large corporates to distribute one-to-many disk images will also need to be modified.Second-chair Linux guru Alan Cox isn't thrilled with the idea either:
"It seems to be very similar to the DVD stuff, including ideas for play once only blocks and the like. Pay per read hard disk," wrote Cox in a posting to the Linux Kernel Archive "Its probably very hard to defeat."
"It also in its current form means you can throw disk defragmenting tools out. Dead, gone. Welcome to the United Police State Of America."
The U.N. system, which started last year, allows those who think they have the real right to a domain to get it back without fighting a costly legal battle or paying large sums of money.So, if a big company thinks they should have your domain, they can ask the WIPO to take it away from you. Lovely.
I can't say it surprised me, because Americans don't seem to trust human beings very much anymore. Give us a complex, human problem, and instead of studying the situation and sitting down to think it through together, you can count on us to come up with a simple, uniform mechanical solution.More to my particular point:
Of course, when the Internet came along, every school needed T-1 lines and an Internet connection and masses of computers . They needed to hire techies to keep the machines in good repair, too. That cut into the money available for teachers, counselors, and art and music programs, but that was OK, because the Internet was going to make our kids sophisticated and computer-literate -- all we'd need teachers for would be guides along the information highway. Does anybody ask what educational results we might have gotten if that same amount of money had been spent on more and better-paid teachers, more library books, and new buildings? Not the politicians.I can't find anything to fault in the author's comments on Bill Gates, web filters, metal detectors, or the vote itself, either. [via YAWL]
I was so upset when I read an article yesterday [via the Dog] about the "importance" of broadband internet for education, that I couldn't write about it coherently. The line that upset me the most:
School buildings are becoming less important, Isakson said, because the lessons taught inside them are often available with a click of a mouse.Looking back at the article now, I can see a little more context that suggests that Isakson may have been talking more about college and other high-level education; if so, then it doesn't bother me as much in reference to students who should have developed some independence by then.
Just the same, even though I'm usually a rabid technocrat, I have reservations about the promotion of high-tech learning at the expense of traditional methods, and I'm not the only one. I think that the most important thing that can possibly help students is to have teachers that care enough about their work to impart unto children a fundamental love for learning. I was incredibly fortunate to have had a number of such teachers in my early years, and believe that the best hope for public education is to pay teachers well enough to entice such people from other, more lucrative fields. I know there are a lot of people in the non-educational world who would make incredible teachers, but who can't see the possibility of making a decent living in that most important of professions. After teachers, students need a safe, comfortable environment for learning, and I that's why I can't buy into the "school buildings are less important" rhetoric in a country where many schools can't get the funding to maintain or repair crumbling (and sometimes unsafe) buildings. Only after these absolute necessities are taken care of can we seriously consider classroom materials, and I've yet to be convinced that computers are as effective a tool as good, old-fashioned textbooks. (I wouldn't mind a good portable e-book system replacing heavy stacks of dead trees, but the technology still has a way to go before it can reasonably replace paper.) I still think computer skills are useful, but I'd prefer to see more emphasis on general computer-based research (alongside traditional library research) over subject-specific tutorial software.
Bah. I rant. Perhaps more later.
Warner Brothers' stated approach to Harry Potter fan Web sites is in direct contradiction to what is really happening. Not only that but our suspicion that it believes it has a right to ANY domain containing ANY reference to Harry Potter has been confirmed. AND it doesn't even look at people's sites before firing off threatening legal letters.
Which makes it all the more strange that anyone that registers a domain name with the words Harry Potter in, will soon receive a letter from Warner Brothers telling them that the company is concerned that your domain "is likely to cause consumer confusion". It uses the author's name prominently, saying that Ms Rowling is "concerned" over the site. (We decided to ask single mum JK Rowling why she was so concerned that young children might want a Harry Potter Web site. Her agent informed us that "Ms Rowling won't be available for interview for the foreseeable future".)I tend to doubt that Ms. Rowling has as much awareness of the domain name jihad as WB claims.
The filtering rider mandates that libraries and schools use valuable resources to install and maintain unreliable Internet filters, or be stripped of key federal funding. With this bill, the federal government has seized control over families and communities and blocked their power to make decisions about the ways they protect their children.[via The Reg]
GORE: I just gotta know. All the stuff that happened in Florida: the phantom felons on the voter rolls, the scrub list from Texas, the crappy voting machines and busy phone lines in African-American precincts, the illegally altered ballot applications in Martin and Seminole counties, the roadblocks, the confusing ballots -- that scary broad with all the makeup. Was it all part of a master plan devised by you, your Dad and Jeb? Please, tell me -- I can take it. Was the fix in?No, this exchange never took place. But it should have.
It's not stupid, however. While legal notice has been served on the owner of harrypotterfan.co.uk, the owner of harrypotterfan.com says that WB hasn't even contacted him. It's not hard to see why - a dotcom battle is a story and bad publicity, a co.uk isn't. This is probably why it thought it was on safe ground with the harrypotterguide.co.uk URL. The shame is that WB withdrawing from this case is unlikely to have any effect at all on its future behaviour.Of course, I'm sure the AOL / Time Warner merger will make things much better for fansites. Not.
In a louder voice, we shouted back: "Why are you using a public institution to promote a junk food product?"
The next thing we know, we are on the ground. The Library of Congress police had tackled us. Again, the crowd cheered -- not for our question, but for the tackle.Tsk, tsk, tsk. Shoulda learned a lesson from the kid with the T-shirt.
I was wandering through a shopping mall in Eureka, Calif., the other day and came upon a gaggle of citizens looking raptly at a bank of TV sets in Radio Shack. Suddenly, they raised howls of excitement. The verdict on the Seminole absentee ballots had just come through. The Eurekans continued to watch, commenting knowledgeably to each other as law professors from Georgetown and Yale did battle over the meaning of the Florida Constitution, the U.S. Constitution and the thoughts of Madison and Hamilton.It's anybody's guess whther the citizenry will still be Paying Attention to how our government works when the next election rools around, but I can hope.
For a very sweet dirty trick along those lines, one could embed a link to a porn picture on-line, resized at 1x1 so it's invisible in the e-mail. Network logs will show that a given employee requested, say, preteen_bestial.gif from www.loathsome-sex-offenders.com. Even better, if the company has spyware in place, the jack-booted network thugs won't even have to be notified by the trickster before grassing him out to senior management.I'm sure Hayduke would approve.
Clarke however sees security vulnerabilities that need an expensive Big Fix, and his proposed one seems strangely familiar. "We have a chance now to make security features inherent rather than appendages... our focus must be the new network." He proposes more secure switches, operating systems (a tip of the hat to the host here), and traffic management protocols. This should be done "as part of a private-public partnership."What crreps me out the most is the suspicion that these folks' idea of "secure" is likely to involve Carnivore-type snooping systems so that the Right People (i.e. themselves) can make sure what they're keeping us secure from.
For the first time in 35 years, Charles M. Schulz will not be here to usher in A Charlie Brown Christmas, the most beloved, contemplative, and melancholy holiday special ever aired on network television. And for those who knew, worked with, and loved the Peanuts creator, the holiday loses just a little bit of its joy.The best Christmas special ever made comes on TV tonight; it's one of very few Christmas shows I still don't find too cloyingly sweet. [via Fresh Hell]
"The Fourth Amendment has been virtually repealed by court decisions, most of which involve drug searches," says Steven Duke, a professor of law at Yale University.This Wired article gives a laundry list of many ways in which our rights to privacy and legal protection have been eroded in the name of Protecting Our Kids from Drugs.
So far Microsoft has issued 96 security notices this year, and there is keen anticipation in security circles that this figure might exceed 100 by the end of December. If it were to license the publication of these bug reports a tidy revenue might be derived with perhaps a premium for those flaws which are the most potentially devastating.Perfectly understandable, since bugs are such an important element of the company's brand identity.
The theory I like the best at the moment is that the naughty words are markers. They give us ways to indicate who we are, what the conversational context is, what group we belong to, how we feel about the person we're talking to.
The gun works through a combination of specially designed bullets and an electronic firing mechanism, which O'Dwyer describes as "a barrel tube with an electrical wire attached." Jacketless bullets are lined up inside, nose to tail, and are separated from one another by a layer of propellant. When an electric current makes its way down the strip, the bullets are set off one by one. To stop them from going off simultaneously--a problem previously encountered when putting many bullets in a single barrel--O'Dwyer designed the bullets to work together. The high pressure caused by the firing of the first projectile makes the nose of the next one in line swell against the walls, temporarily sealing off the rest of the barrel. (In ballistics terms, the nose of the second bullet effectively acts as a breechblock to prevent an uncontrolled sympathetic ignition.) After the first bullet exits, the pressure drops, and the nose of the second one loosens up, enabling the bullet to be fired. This process continues for each successive bullet.What makes this especially fascinating is that this was created by a garage inventor with no background in ballistics. [via STREETtech]
Overnight analysis by engineers at Mission Control suggest that the second array can be properly unfurled if the rollout is done in increments stretching over an hour, rather than non-stop in 13 minutes as was done last nightIn the meantime, election and space news go hand in hand: a dimpled chad is visible from space.