April 2002 Archives

According to Time Warner/AOL's CEO, every time you don't watch a commercial, you're ripping off some poor defenseless billionaire.

Because of the ad skips.... It's theft. Your contract with the network when you get the show is you're going to watch the spots. Otherwise you couldn't get the show on an ad-supported basis. Any time you skip a commercial or watch the button you're actually stealing the programming.

[via Plastic] I think that last sentence was transcribed wrong. Anyway, it looks like the big media distribution companies are going to keep ramping up the hysteria until they can convince the government to give them absolute control of your home electronics. [and thanks to O-Dub for the picture] P.S. I occasionally watch TV with my aunt & uncle when I visit them. They have a habit of muting the TV sound during commecial breaks so they can talk to each other. Does this make them hardened criminals too?

A premium on fairness?

|
I know that, as regularly as I read Salon.com, I really ought to buy a "premium" membership. However, sometimes their choices of what to publish as premium content seem strange to me. Case in point: Today, the site published a column by David Horowitz as a premium article, but an apparent rebuttal to Horowitz's remarks is available for free. It seems inherently unbalanced to allow access to only one side of this story for most of the site's readers.

Filk You!

|
TMBG meets LotR [via VM, OK?]
In the latest battle in the spyware arms race, a multimedia viewer with bundled spyware has started covertly uninstalling a popular anti-spyware program.

Fritz on the Fritz

|
Senator Fritz Hollings (D-SC), the enemy of all computer users everywhere, is at it again. His latest insanity may be called the Online Personal Privacy Act, but it actually seems to promote the use of spyware to quietly gather personal information.
I've been holding back on commenting on the latest happenings in the Microsoft trial, but it looks like some of my long-held beliefs about the Big M's coding practices were correct. Most importantly, Microsoft has been sacrificing modularity for monopoly:

But Jones conceded during questioning that some of Windows interlocking code benefits Microsoft commercially and does not have a clear technical reason to be commingled.

Otherwise, though, I'm just too tired of the trial to follow it closely. Which may have been Microsoft's strategy all along.

Moving Day

| | Comments (2)
OK, why didn't anybody tell me that Gregg Easterbrook, the Tuesday Morning Quarterback, had moved to ESPN? I found the news in a post to a forum on the column's old home.

Tuesday Morning Quarterback operates from the premise that pro football is an absurd artificial universe, and therefore takes nothing seriously. (Of course, there are entire NFL teams that treat pro football as an absurd artificial universe.) The column, subject of feature stories in the New York Times and USA Today, as well as on NPR, mixes hard football commentary with history, science, science fiction, politics and anything else that can be shoehorned in, regardless of relevancy.

This is the writer who finally got me to take a real interest in football.

Photo of the Day

|
New from Children's Television Workshop: Lobby me Elmo. [via Plastic]

Only in Texas

|
The newest political scandal in West Texas seems to be the castration of the mayor of a quiet border town. Of course, the mayor was an alcoholic. And a goat.

Apply the Formula

|
John Scalzi suggests a good rule of thumb about when it's OK to make fun of someone's ethnicity:

1. Take the number of years the ethnic group in question was abused/enslaved/pushed off land/discriminated against/provided smallpox-covered blankets/made to work illegally for pennies a day by white folk here in the US. This is your number X.

2. Take the number of years members of the ethnic group in question have been able to join a private country club in Georgia. This is your number Y.

3. Divide X by Y.

If the resulting number is greater than one... It's probably best that you keep your wryly amusing idea to yourself.

I propose that any television writer who suggests a lame amnesia plot twist on an otherwise excellent series be hit on the head repeatedly until they can no longer remember their own name.

You've Got (Dis)Trust!

| | Comments (1)
I don't poke around with my browser security settings very much, but I had to grant an internal site a higher level of access to debug a problem. (A plague upon lamebrain internal developers and their custom ActiveX controls!) What do I find in my "trusted sites" list? I must be the last geek on the net to hear about free.aol.com insinuating its way into my security settings. Damned if I know what I could have downloaded onto this machine that would have installed it, though.
More on that federally-funded anti-goth initiative. [via Boing Boing]

Across the street in the Independence Center mall, the store Hot Topic is perhaps the only one in the area that carries Goth merchandise. The back wall displays several black velvet and lace medieval-era gowns and dresses.

An employee of the store, who said he was not allowed to give his name, said many teens in the area feel stifled by the suburban blandness of Blue Springs and are seeking forms of self-expression.

He said he is angry that police are singling out a group whose members are no more likely to get involved in criminal activity than the cleanest-cut teens.

"Some (Goths) are as wholesome as kids get. It's just that they wear black clothes and makeup," he said.

Clue No. 1: Most of the "serious" Goth's I've known have been too pretentious dedicated to shop at Goths 'R' Us Hot Topic, and would probably look down on those who did. (The Revolution Will Not Be Marketed.) Anybody buying a "counterculture" lifestyle down at the mall on Mom & Dad's credit card isn't even remotely "at risk". But then, if I'd ever heard of "Goth culture" back in my high school days, I probably would have been into it.
Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks women with glasses are hot.
Some remarkably clued remarks from the head of the National Association of Recording Merchandisers about music distribution:

Over the last year we’ve heard a lot about the fact that no legitimate business can compete with “free,” and that the file sharing services, starting with Napster, needed to be shut down. By extension, of course, if Napster is a contributory infringer of copyright, this means that the music fans who file share, are primary infringers, or pirates. From NARM’s perspective, we think this industry should be thinking long and hard about the viability of any approach that treats all our customers like criminals.

In thinking this issue through, we’ve increasingly come to the conclusion that the decision tree isn’t about “free”, it’s about value. In today’s marketplace, survey after survey tells us music fans think most CDs contain only one or two good cuts. Their reluctance to pay $15 – $20 for two good cuts is evident not just through depressed sales of hit titles, but also through the increased sales of used CDs. Many retailers are concerned that the value proposition for music is no longer competitive in the consumers’ eyes.

We all need to return to listening to consumers, and really listening. If we just blow them off as immoral pirates who simply want to steal music, we’ll never fix the problems we see today. But if we get back to treating customers with a bit of respect, and if we pay attention to the 24% of downloaders bought more music because of file-sharing last year, and to the 81% that are willing to pay for music, then we have a chance of turning sales around.

In light of these words from a group that (unlike the RIAA) actually has to deal with music consumers, I have to reconsider my blanket condemnation of the music distribution industry. [via Blogaritaville via Boing Boing]

Burning Without Fire

|
A Risks Digest contributor invokes Bradbury in pointing out a particularly chilling possibilty of mandatory Digital Rights Management:

Perhaps it is unfair to compare the current legislative efforts to protect copyright interests or to prevent children from being exposed to images and words that are beyond their years with the unambiguous horror of burning a book because of the ideas contained inside. But technology does not make such distinctions, and capability creates opportunity. Already software filters have been turned on controversial ideas and unpopular organizations. And new copyright techniques will digitally incinerate recorded words that might otherwise be widely available.

It looks like Hollywood may be giving fans of classic sci-fi an embarassment of riches — if, of course, they give these beloved tales a respectful screen treatment. The latest news is that Paramount has acquired movie rights to the John Carter of Mars books by Edgar Rice Burroughs.

By any other name

| | Comments (2)
Ya gotta love AMD's new trademarked processor names, especially since a couple of them sound just a tad... esoteric. I'm sure the 'Forteon' chip will be wonderful for parameteorological analysis, especially rains of fish, and the 'Metaron' processor sounds like it's designed for divine speech recognition applications. (And if you don't get the joke, be glad.)

The RIAA Strikes Back

|
Unfortunately, in other digital media news, the RIAA has managed to bully $1 million out of a company that was letting its employees share MP3's on an internal server. Also: A Missouri group has been given nearly a quarter of a million dollars of federal funding to persecute Goths. [both via BoingBoing]

Off the Rails

|
Last month, I blogged a fellow who built his own backyard rollercoaster. Now comes word of another hobbyist who's built his own personal monorail system. I have to assume that the garden log flume is next. [via Grudnuk]
I've been thinking a lot about the proposed opening of ANWR to oil drilling lately, and I think I'd put one extra condition on it that Tom Tomorrow doesn't mention. If we allow the oil industry to drill there, permission is the only thing we give the oil companies. I'm beginning to wonder if the oil there is really worth the cost the industry would need to build to drill there, if the government doesn't subsidize the necessary infrastructure.
Apparently, the automobile industry has decided to take all the worst aspects of computer interfaces and add them to our cars.

The New 7 series BMW no longer has all those knobs and buttons that clutter up the dashboard - you know, where each knob does one thing that you can count on. Instead, it has a single controller located on the center console that "functions similarly to a computer mouse." It drives a display in the center of the dashboard. It is called the iDrive: i for "intuitive". (Don't get me started on intuitive. You know what's intuitive? Fear of heights. Everything else we call intuitive, such as walking or using a pencil took years of practice. Is that what we want? A control that takes years of practice?)

Just what we need. Somebody being distracted from the road just to figure out how to turn on their windshield wipers. Update: To get a taste of the true horror, go to BMW's 7 Series page and click on "Ergonomics".
Steve Jackson seems to detest Wizards of the Coast, but it looks like even his company is jumping on the d20 bandwagon.

My TV is watching me.

|
Interactive television isn't waiting for some new gadget to hook up to the TV; it's already here.

And indeed, the online fan base does occasionally have a direct effect on the show, in the convention known as the "shout-out": a character named after an online poster, a playful reference to an Internet joke, or occasionally, a direct satire of the online herd. ("Worst! Episode! Ever!") The most startling such shout-out occurred just last week, when Aaron Sorkin, The West Wing creator who sparred with posters on Television Without Pity (back when it was called "mighty big tv"), struck back at his tormentors—by enlisting them in a subplot on his show. When White House Deputy Chief of Staff Josh Lyman discovers a critical Web site devoted to him, he becomes tangled in its byzantine internal politics, then (like Sorkin) sees one of his posts end up in the newspapers. Lyman's special tormentor, the moderator of the site, is portrayed as a muumuu-clad, chain-smoking dictator—a nasty slap at Sorkin's own nemesis at Television Without Pity. The majority of the site's posters were amused, but a few took umbrage. "Glark" (the technical director of TWP) responded online: "If 'we' at TWOP are the TV critic terrorists and we've gotten under his skin enough that he's changing the way he writes and shoe-horning these plots into the show then—ladies and gentlemen—the terrorists have already won."

The recap of the West Wing episode in question is here, including the recapper's "Aaron Sorkin is not laughing with you" rant.

Microsoft brand dog food

|
As a testament to the "ease" of divesting your company of those troublesome UNIX systems, Microsoft's anti-UNIX site is back on line. It had previously been running on a BSD/Apache system itself, and it apparently only took the better part of a week to switch this one site to Microsoft's Win2K/IIS combination. It's still iffy whether Microsoft is now limiting its diet to its own dog food, though; the server in question seems to be running some sort of open source SQL backend.
I'm pretty impressed with the "ambitious slate of original miniseries and movies" that the Sci Fi channel has just announced. The very idea of a Chronicles of Amber miniseries blows me away, as long as they don't try to cram too many of the books into four hours; Amber could make for a great series. A couple of these project descriptions raise questions for me, though. First, does this Battlestar Galactica project have anything to do with the trailer that Richard "Apollo" Hatch was pitching at SF conventions a couple of years ago? Second, the proposed On the Seventh Day series sounds exactly like Philip Jose Farmer's Dayworld series, yet the article doesn't mention him. At any rate, I'm looking forward to seeing what becomes of these projects. P.S. Has anybody heard any news about the Buckaroo Banzai TV series that was supposedly in development a couple of years back?
Given the date, I have to remain open ot the possibility that this news is just a joke, but apparently, Microsoft's anti-UNIX website is running on a FreeBSD (an open source UNIX) server. (Which reminds me: Has Microsoft ever successfully migrated its Hotmail free e-mail service off of FreeBSD?) By the way, Kevin Fox has some good commentary on Microsoft's anti-UNIX claims.
I went to see Blade II this weekend, and I can hardly recommend it. While the acting, stunts, and plot were a cut above (I'm sorry — no, actually, I'm not) the original movie, this is the first movie I've seen in a long time that exceeded my tolerance for gore and violence. Aside from monster designs that would probably leave H. R. Geiger wondering what the hell, I can't remember seeing more gruesome deaths (or in too many cases, "that thing can't possibly still be moving" reactions) on film. Of course, there's always the disturbing possibility that I have to admit that I'm outside the "target demographic" these days.

AFD

|
Happy New Year, everybody! Sorry I haven't had time to do something special for today. P.S. According to Firda, chunshek is tracking today's mayhem. Better him than me.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from April 2002 listed from newest to oldest.

March 2002 is the previous archive.

May 2002 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0