July 2002 Archives
So, one particular industry would have the privilege to perform actions for which other legislation would impose draconian punishment on private citizens. (Of course, if we all become content publishers, this legislation opens up some interesting possibilities...)The legislation would immunize groups such as the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America from all state and federal laws if they disable, block or otherwise impair a "publicly accessible peer-to-peer network."
Anyone whose computer was damaged in the process must receive the permission of the U.S. attorney general before filing a lawsuit, and a suit could be filed only if the actual monetary loss was more than $250.
Hmm. I'm thinking lots of roast beef, piled with caramelized onions and perhaps some sauteed mushrooms. Gruyere melted on top. Served hot on good French bread, dressed with tomato, shredded lettuce, and mayo.
Maybe that doesn't describe me in any useful way, but damn if I don't want one now.[via boingboing]...movie people as a whole have trouble understanding the joys of interactive media. It's just a different culture. A distopian movie about virtual worlds, like The Matrix, can make its way through Hollywood and be distributed, but a utopian movie about an interactive future seemingly cannot. Movie people are subliminally terrified by interactivity. It spells not only a loss of creative control, which movie people would miss more than you can imagine, but also a loss of business model. Napster lurks implicitly inside every shared virtual world that's under the control of its users. The world that seems utopian to me is distopian to Hollywood.
